Comments on: Loser http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/ Where tact goes to die Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:17:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Avitable http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15245 Avitable Sun, 02 Dec 2007 14:40:03 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15245 <b>Bec</b>, ummmm, yeah . . . Bec, ummmm, yeah . . .

]]> By: Bec http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15226 Bec Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:34:47 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15226 I've always been a loser, and now I can say that I have proof... The Dancing With The Stars thing though. DWTS is so so so much better than it's parent and original Strictly Come Dancing - the UK horror show that doesn't finish for another 3 weeks! ARRRGGGHHH! (Just to be clear I don't watch it but it's on before Robin Hood which I do watch and the 5 minutes I catch (because it always overruns) is enough to put me in a bad mood for whole minutes!) Me Loser? Hell yes. I’ve always been a loser, and now I can say that I have proof…

The Dancing With The Stars thing though. DWTS is so so so much better than it’s parent and original Strictly Come Dancing – the UK horror show that doesn’t finish for another 3 weeks! ARRRGGGHHH! (Just to be clear I don’t watch it but it’s on before Robin Hood which I do watch and the 5 minutes I catch (because it always overruns) is enough to put me in a bad mood for whole minutes!)

Me Loser? Hell yes.

]]> By: Avitable http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15197 Avitable Sat, 01 Dec 2007 13:07:26 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15197 <b>Lisa</b>, ok, there, Stuart Smalley. <b>Usedtobeme</b>, you tell me! Lisa, ok, there, Stuart Smalley.

Usedtobeme, you tell me!

]]> By: usedtobeme http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15191 usedtobeme Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:12:27 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15191 Where exactly do I fit on that list? Where exactly do I fit on that list?

]]> By: Lisa http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15184 Lisa Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:15:37 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15184 If I have more sense than my doctors and feel that I should have an honorary doctorate does that qualify for non-loser status? Actually I could care less if I'm a loser. I'm am who I am and gosh darnit people like me. If I have more sense than my doctors and feel that I should have an honorary doctorate does that qualify for non-loser status?

Actually I could care less if I’m a loser.

I’m am who I am and gosh darnit people like me.

]]> By: Avitable http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15181 Avitable Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:09:57 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15181 <b>Lynda</b>, good point. <b>TMP</b>, yup! <b>Geeky</b>, no, that makes you a winner. <b>Melanie</b>, well, watching AI when they're eliminating people in the beginning is okay. <b>Michael</b>, and for many more reasons unmentioned as well, I'm sure. <b>Bogup</b>, well, since my name is four syllables, I can only assume you're talking about someone named Apache. Lynda, good point.

TMP, yup!

Geeky, no, that makes you a winner.

Melanie, well, watching AI when they’re eliminating people in the beginning is okay.

Michael, and for many more reasons unmentioned as well, I’m sure.

Bogup, well, since my name is four syllables, I can only assume you’re talking about someone named Apache.

]]> By: bogup http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15180 bogup Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:20:54 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15180 <i>Bogup, you have never made a sweeping generalization about someone?</i> Only one person that I can recall, and his name is three syllables, and starts with an "A" and ends in "E." OK, I'm a double loser, eh? Bite me. Bogup, you have never made a sweeping generalization about someone?

Only one person that I can recall, and his name is three syllables, and starts with an “A” and ends in “E.” OK, I’m a double loser, eh? Bite me.

]]> By: Michael http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15178 Michael Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:32:35 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15178 This comment isn't being left so as not to be thought of as a loser, I already am a loser according to several other of those. This comment isn’t being left so as not to be thought of as a loser, I already am a loser according to several other of those.

]]> By: Melanie http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15177 Melanie Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:50:14 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15177 I saw that you listed watching American Idol, America's Next Top Model, Dancing with the Stars, or Survivor as qualifiers, and realized that at some point I have watched and enjoyed all of these shows. Therefore, soy un perdedor. But dude, the "jesus, these people are hysterical" factor on those shows is too much for me. I can't resist. Plus, did you hear that one of the networks is adding 2 hours of reality teevee programming this season because of the writers' strike? God bless the writers' strike. More dumbassery to laugh at. I saw that you listed watching American Idol, America’s Next Top Model, Dancing with the Stars, or Survivor as qualifiers, and realized that at some point I have watched and enjoyed all of these shows.
Therefore, soy un perdedor. But dude, the “jesus, these people are hysterical” factor on those shows is too much for me. I can’t resist.
Plus, did you hear that one of the networks is adding 2 hours of reality teevee programming this season because of the writers’ strike?
God bless the writers’ strike. More dumbassery to laugh at.

]]> By: Geeky Tai-Tai http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15174 Geeky Tai-Tai Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:11:35 +0000 http://www.avitable.com/2007/11/30/loser/#comment-15174 I'm a loser for sitting here reading <i>all</i> of these comments, including RW's "one sentence block of dense text". I’m a loser for sitting here reading all of these comments, including RW’s “one sentence block of dense text”.

]]>