Posts Tagged ‘critic’

My review of Alice in Wonderland (Spoiler Free)

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

I'm not sure what to say about this movie. I'll start with the visuals. It was beautiful. A perfect Tim Burton world, realized down to every little detail. I could watch full scenes without paying attention to the dialogue and just enjoy how damn pretty it looked, all with its own skewed twist.

The story, however, needed a lot of work. It was written like someone read Lewis Carroll's work, pulled out some key phrases, and tried to write a script around them. It didn't have the feel of Carroll, of his illogical logic and random strangeness. Rather than expand on the universe, using the same rules set forth by Carroll, it was a poorly made Xerox of Wonderland, with some smudges right where the important parts were.

I don't know what genius decided to name this "Alice in Wonderland" but make a Hook-like return to Wonderland. I don't know why anyone thought that watching Tim Burton work his mad genius on the original works would be a poor idea. I don't know why this movie existed other than to give Johnny Depp a ridiculous Scottish accent and a bigger role than he really needed.

I liked it, but it should have been named something different. And the dialogue should have been rewritten by someone with a brain. And the gorgeous actress who played Alice, Mia Wasikowska, should have done some full frontal nudity.

I give it three out of five vorpal blades.

(And for those of you who haven't read the original works, the poem I posted yesterday is verbatim from Carroll's works.)

My review of Edge of Darkness (Spoiler Free)

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Last night, I went to see "Edge of Darkness", Mel Gibson's first movie in eight years. I know many people who won't go watch him because of his drunken anti-Semitic tirade a few years ago, but I watch movies to see actors act. I don't have to like their personal views.

Edge of Darkness is a dark look at a cop who loses his only daughter. He is widowed, we presume, because there's no mention of his wife and her mother in the entire film. In the end, he has nothing left to live for, and he's determined that those responsible will pay. It's not as gritty as "Man on Fire" or "Payback", but it's not as slick as "Ransom", either. The tone is bleak but sometimes resorts to just enough bloody splashes of violence to change it up. Martin Campbell, who also directed "Casino Royale", which is one of the best Bond films to date, kept the story tight. With the exception of a few unnecessary moments of exposition that I can only imagine are put in there for audiences who can't understand the Boston accents being thrown around (It gets a bit thick sometimes!), it's a good movie. A little predictable and a little derivative, but I enjoyed seeing Mel Gibson in a role that he fits into like a glove.

I give it three out of five Sugartits.

My review of Avatar (Spoiler Free)

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

avatar-movie-poster

Avatar is James Cameron's opus. He's been working on it for the last fifteen years, a fact that is certain to raise most people's expectations to impossible-to-meet standards. Without going into details, the film focuses on a future where the human race is attempting to mine an inhabited planet for a valuable resource. The inhabitants, a tall, strong, blue-skinned humanoid people called the Na'vi, are resisting, and so Na'vi bodies are grown that can be controlled remotely by humans so that they can walk among this alien race.

The story is predictable and simple. It's Dancing With Wolves meets Alien meets The Abyss. The original script treatment by Cameron had many more elements that created ambiguity and complexities that were noticeably absent in this version. I have no doubt that the director's cut will likely contain some of these aspects and will probably be six hours long, too.

Even with the basic plot and one-dimensional characters, the movie is phenomenal. I saw it in 3D, and the world was so engrossing that you begin to get lost in it. At one point, characters in the movie raised their arms, and I almost yelled at the people sitting in front of me because I thought it was them. You forget that most of the movie is not real. Each Na'vi is so realistic, with subtle facial expressions and a tangible feeling of having a soul, that you are fully invested in each of them as characters.

This movie earns its PG-13 rating. It's dark and violent and will frighten small children. The two five year old children seated behind me were perfect examples of kids who should not have been at this movie, especially since their mother had to leave with them about half way through. This is a movie for kids 10 and older, at the very minimum, and only those who have the attention span to sit still for almost three hours.

I thoroughly enjoyed the film and can't wait to go back and watch it again, this time in IMAX 3D. It's one of my favorite movies of the year. I give it four and a half out of five stars.

My review of Fantastic Mr. Fox (spoiler free)

Sunday, December 6th, 2009

fantastic-mr-fox

Who knew that two of my favorite movies from 2009 would be purportedly created for children by auteur directors? Spike Jonze's "Where The Wild Things Are" and Wes Anderson's "Fantastic Mr. Fox" are based on children's books but have appeal to all audiences and maybe are even better suited for older children and adults than the youngest set.

A quirky, funny, bittersweet look at the lives of a fox family, replete with father/son issues, husband/wife issues, and quasi-sibling rivalry, this film will make you laugh, gasp, and feel sad. The animation is beautiful and painstakingly created, and it's directed wonderfully with all of the feel of a comic heist movie, yet in a heartfelt way.

It might be a little too dark for kids under 6 or so, but anyone else with a soul should appreciate this touching adaptation of a classic book. It expands on the story and even departs considerably from the Roald Dahl feel and rhythm, but that wasn't a distraction or a negative feeling. It just felt like its own story, or maybe the real story upon which Dahl's short tale was based.

I give it five out of five cussin' stars.

My Review of Surrogates

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

surrogates-movie-posterSurrogates is a movie that takes place in a not-too-distant future where all interaction between humans is done through surrogate robots. From the safety of your home, you control a body that sees, hears, smells, tastes, and feels for you, allowing you to do all of the things you wanted to do in life without the fear of being injured or killed. You can have a surrogate that is a different sex, race, age, or even something that's brand new and unique. It's painted as an utopian future.

And, of course, in any utopian future, there is the faction of people who are unhappy with it. In this instance, the people who refuse to use machines to interact with other humans but who relish the human experience. And then there's the murder of a surrogate's user through the destruction of a surrogate, something that's supposed to be impossible. And Bruce Willis plays the FBI agent who investigates it all.

The movie had some really interesting concepts and in the hands of a better writer, or even as a movie longer than 88 minutes (or maybe a television series), it could have touched on some of the more fascinating aspects of this society. Have restaurants and hair salons gone out of business? Have surrogates gone to different planets and under the ocean? Could you make surrogates that are giant sized or microscopic? How do people keep from having their muscles atrophy?

Unfortunately, this movie just skimmed along and barely broke the surface of the ocean of possibilities. It was rather predictable, especially if you saw the previews that ruined the entire ending, and while everyone did a decent job acting, it was too heavy handed while being simultaneously shallow to really work well.

I'd give it a C.

The shallow movie critic II

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

Back in June, I did the first "shallow movie critic" post. The premise is simple:

Who says you can't judge a book by its cover? I'll demonstrate the fallacy of that statement by writing completely accurate movie synopses based solely on the images on the poster.

Cloverfield

Cloverfield

Cloverfield: There's this guy who has the worst luck in the world. On the day that he's going to take his girlfriend up to the top of the Statue of Liberty and propose to her, a gang of terrorists blow it up and kill her while he watches. Despondent, he runs back to his home country of Ireland where he finds a magical clover field that has thousands of four leaf clovers. His luck changes instantly, and he is blessed with riches and many friends, plus an elderly uncle dies and gives him a castle. He meets a new girl and falls in love, and they decide to fly back to New York to get married but right before he gets on the plane, he trips and breaks his neck. At first he curses the clover field for taking his luck, but then when he sees the news that a meteor destroyed NYC, he realizes that he was lucky after all.

He's Just Not That Into You

He's Just Not That Into You

He's Just Not That Into You: A woman working at one of those factories that makes candy hearts is bitter about love. Every boyfriend she gets dumps her within weeks, and she decides that if she can't be happy, nobody can be happy. She starts making horrible messages to go into random bags of candy hearts, like "I have herpes" and "I'm leaving you because you won't do anal" and these bags are sent worldwide. One man finds one of her hearts that says "He's just not that into you" in the street after an angry girl throws it away, and he decides to track down the person who wrote it. He finds her and falls in love and in the end, she makes a heart that says "Will you marry me?" that she gives to him and he says yes.

(500) Days of Summer

(500) Days of Summer

(500) Days of Summer: In the days after the polar icecaps melt, our annual cycle changes so that we have a year and a half of overwhelming heat, followed by an oppressive winter for another 500 days. One young boy ignores the end of times and burning heat to write letters to the love of his life, who lives in another country, but he can't visit her because all of the boats broke when the icecaps melted and planes can't fly because they melt when they get too close to the sun thanks to the ozone layer disappearing. He writes her a letter for every day of summer and right before the winter takes over, he dies from skin cancer, which she doesn't find out until she arrives after taking almost all winter to walk across the frozen ocean to be with him.

Star Trek

Star Trek

Star Trek: The Motion Picture: Three super beings, each with a power over a part of the color spectrum, arrive on Earth. Aquagreen, Red Man, and Yellow Forehead are fish out of water as they look for someone with the mysterious power over the color white. They find a small boy who has dreamed in black and white his entire life and they help him with bullies and his unwilling-to-understand stepfather and he helps them unlock the mystery of the universe. Oh, and there's a bad guy who controls black that they have to beat with all of their powers combined.

Quantum of Solace

Quantum of Solace

Quantum of Solace: This guy goes around killing everyone who uses the phrase "Quantum of Solace" because it doesn't make any fucking sense.


And now your requisite daily Halloween Party blurb:

Did you know that Dave2 from Blogography drew an exclusive design just for our Halloween Party? It's only available for a limited time, and you can only get this design here. Don't miss out on a chance to own this awesome piece of art! For every order, a small percentage goes towards the party fund, so buy early and buy often:

My review of The Time Traveler's Wife (Spoiler Free)

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

Eric Bana notices a booger.

Eric Bana notices a booger.

Make no mistake about this film. It is a chick flick. It's a love story with science fiction elements. It's like if you took Steel Magnolias and made Julia Roberts's character a cyborg with laser beam eyes. Yeah, it's fucking cool, but don't expect her to go all flash fry killer robot on anyone.

Even though it was pointed directly at the female audience, I really enjoyed the movie. Eric Bana's Henry and Rachel McAdams's Clare have genuine feeling chemistry when the moment is right and have that sense of awkwardness when the moment isn't. As far as a love story and romantic movie go, it's clever and unique. It never felt really cliched or obvious (like in The Ugly Truth), and even the tearjerker moments weren't telegraphed a half hour ahead of time (like in The Ugly Truth). And Eric Bana could teach The Ugly Truth's Gerard Butler some lessons on speaking with an American accent.

This movie is sad. It's dark. It may make you cry. And if that's the type of movie that you're in the mood to see, go see this. If you want a fun romcom romp through time, rent Back to the Future.

Oh, and if I have to see another preview for that fucking idiot Tyler Perry's "I Can Do Bad All By Myself", I may stab my eyes out. It's unbelievable to see yet another black producer/writer/director make money by preying on stereotypes and cliched writing rather than trying to write stories about people.

Movie Reviews (Spoiler Free): GI Joe and Julie & Julia

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

Friday, I saw two movies. In the morning, I took all of my employees out to the theater like I do almost every Friday. We saw "G.I. Joe – The Rise of Cobra". In the evening, Amy and I ventured downtown to a new theater called the Plaza Cinema Cafe where we sat at one of the indoor bars, ordered food and drinks, and then watched "Julie and Julia". It's 10 PM on Friday night as I write this, and I'm fucking movied out.

Review #1: G.I. Joe – The Rise of Cobra

Did you ever play with action figures and make them smash into each other while saying "PEW PEW PEW KRRSHHBOOM" and come up with ludicrous scenarios that involved your couch being an arctic base and under the couch being the ocean and there were subs and planes and shooting and explosions and faulty logic but it was oh so much fun because you were in the moment? That's what this movie is. And let me tell you, I fucking hate director and writer Stephen Sommers. Almost every movie he's directed (Van Helsing, The Mummy, & The Mummy Returns) has been a huge stinking pile of shit. He's taken concepts that could have been so amazing and managed to turdify them until they're unrecognizable fecal failures. For some reason, though, it finally works here. Maybe the writers are better, although there's plenty of horrible dialogue, unnecessary exposition, and throwaway lines. Maybe he's matured as a director, although his use of the flashback fade is about as amateurish as Mic Night at the local coffee house. I think he just found a property that even he couldn't fuck up. It was cheesy and it was stupid as all hell, but it was fun, and I enjoyed watching it.

Review #2: Julie & Julia

Have I ever mentioned that I hate Meryl Streep? She's hideous to me, and I want her to die in a horrible car wreck that also claims the lives of Kyra Sedgwick and Glenn Close. Well, she's in this movie, but she manages to assume the role of Julia Child so well that I was able to keep my gorge from rising too much. The movie is based on a biography of Julia Child and a book by Julie Powell, which was in turn based on her blog. I've never heard of the book or her blog, and from what I saw in the movie, I wouldn't have had any interest in it, either. The movie was mildly entertaining, but dragged a bit too long and didn't really seem to have much of a point. I can see why people will enjoy it, but it's not exactly to my taste. See what I did there? It's a movie about cooking and I said taste! Ha!

Next Movie Friday is "District 9" and I'm not quite sure what to expect. On the negative side, it's produced by Peter Jackson, and he is an abominable hack with some of the worst taste I've ever seen (not to mention none of his movies have been any good since Frighteners). Also on the negative side, the director and writer, Neill Blomkamp, has absolutely no real credits to his name, so this is his first real endeavor. On the positive side, the previews do look cool. And everyone knows the previews never lie.

My review of Drag Me To Hell (Spoiler Free)

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

Justin Long or a chameleon?

Justin Long or a chameleon?

A long time ago in a B-movie world far, far away, a man named Sam Raimi made a trilogy of movies: Evil Dead, Evil Dead 2, and Army of Darkness. They got increasingly funnier and they were cheesy, cornball horror fun. Some cheap scares, poor effects, and a sense of fun made this a great series of movies that have infinite rewatchability.

His latest foray into the cornball horror genre hit theaters Friday with "Drag Me To Hell", starring Alison Lohman and Justin Long (or a chameleon. I really can't tell the difference. He is an ugly, ugly man with eyeballs that are way too far apart.). In a tale reminiscent of Stephen King's "Thinner", a gypsy curse results in dire consequences for Alison Lohman's loan officer. The few twists are predictable, but it's not the destination that matters with this movie. It's how you get there.

With a penchant for gross-out scenes that alternate between cheesy and hilarious, this film is light summer fare and fun for the whole cornball horror genre lovin' family. There are a few surprising scares and some great atmosphere. And if you walk in expecting a scare-your-pants-off horror movie like The Ring or Exorcist or torture-porn like Hostel, you'll be sorely disappointed. It's like when you think you're eating mayo and it turns out to be bleu cheese dressing. If you expect cheese, it's okay, but if you're thinking delicious mayo, you'll be fucking pissed.

I give it a B.

My review of Terminator: Salvation (Spoiler Free)

Saturday, May 23rd, 2009

terminator_salvation_robot

If only previews were representative of the actual movie for which it's advertising, I would be one ecstatic movie watcher. So many movies would be hilariously funny with awesome action scenes, great emotional gravitas, and amazing soundtracks. Alas, this is not the case. In most situations, the previews are created as part of a slick marketing machine, designed to pull together the elements of a film that has been determined to be the most attractive, slap on some appropriate music that won't appear anywhere during the two-hour air time, and spread that preview all over TV and the Internet. The movie itself may be excellent or may be dreadful with one or two shining moments, already exhibited ad nauseam in the previews. Terminator: Salvation is somewhere in between those two extremes.

Unlike Wolverine, which was a shitfest of mediocrity, T:S has glimpses of brilliance showing through the plotholes, ham-fisted dialogue, and random screaming. These few shining moments are a direct result of the cast, despite the director and screenwriters. Christian Bale does his best to inject John Connor with emotional weight even as he is handed overwrought line after line. Sam Worthington has some of the best scenes in T:S, punctuated by some of the cheesiest scenes. I can almost imagine fuckin' McG telling him, "Sammy (because you know a douche like McG would call him Sammy), I want you to throw your arms out to the world and scream. Yeah, I know you've already done that fourteen times already, but trust me, it'll be rad! Oh, and we'll take that scream in post production and make it sound so generic that it could be used for any number of situations." Common does a decent job as John Connor's #2, ranking somewhere between Dwight Yoakam and Ice Cube on the scale of "Musicians who become actors". And Anton Yelchin (did you know that he's actually from the former USSR?) once again demonstrates why he should be in more movies by stealing the show as a young Kyle Reese. Bryce Dallas Howard and Helena Bonham Carter are both particularly useless in T:S, especially since they are written as one-dimensional stereotypes.

What should have been an outstanding movie about the war against the machines and the rise of John Connor as the leader of the Resistance was instead a mediocre effort that contained all of the trite elements that must be listed in the movie-making checklist that McG and his ilk use:

  • Cute kid who has some disability but still manages to come through in the end and be resourceful even though everyone knows that kid would have died instantly? Check.
  • Completely unnecessary scene where a woman almost gets raped just so you can see a male character save her? Check.
  • Repetitive slap-you-in-the-face dialogue and plot points to ensure that the absolute stupidest person in the room gets it, with no sense of subtlety? Check.
  • Complete and utter disregard of the danger of ever-present, never-sleeping killer machines when it suits the situation? Check.
  • A world where everyone is perpetually dirty and unwashed, yet they all have white shiny perfect teeth? Check.
  • Building crescendo of music to indicate a dramatic moment because the dialogue is not sufficient? Check.

The dialogue is so clunky that it's like it was written by a 15-year old who saw the first two Terminators, drank four Red Bulls, and then watched Top Gun. Here is my version of some of John Connor's dialogue in this movie:

"This is John Connor. We are at war. War is bad and dark. But we must remain human. Or else we are no better than the machines. This is John Connor."

"My name is John Connor. You are The Resistance. Here are some weaknesses for the machines that will seem like foreshadowing but won't really matter in any way. Each of you listening to me – you are The Resistance. I am John Connor."

"This is John Connor. Please pass the potatoes. You are The Resistance. I am John "Mashed Potatoes" Connor."

This is not a movie that will get better with time. This is not a movie that built on the backs of the superior films that preceded it (even Terminator 3). This is brainless, irrational, shiny junk that could have been so much more. It's obvious that McG, the douchiest douched that ever douche, had aspirations of greatness, and it's equally apparent that his aspirations fell far short. Maybe you should have aimed a bit lower. Learned how to make movies instead of music videos. Given the reins to someone who could have done the film some justice, instead of squandering it all for this forgettable brain fart of a movie.

I give it a C-.