Posts Tagged ‘reviews’

My review of Fantastic Mr. Fox (spoiler free)

Sunday, December 6th, 2009

fantastic-mr-fox

Who knew that two of my favorite movies from 2009 would be purportedly created for children by auteur directors? Spike Jonze's "Where The Wild Things Are" and Wes Anderson's "Fantastic Mr. Fox" are based on children's books but have appeal to all audiences and maybe are even better suited for older children and adults than the youngest set.

A quirky, funny, bittersweet look at the lives of a fox family, replete with father/son issues, husband/wife issues, and quasi-sibling rivalry, this film will make you laugh, gasp, and feel sad. The animation is beautiful and painstakingly created, and it's directed wonderfully with all of the feel of a comic heist movie, yet in a heartfelt way.

It might be a little too dark for kids under 6 or so, but anyone else with a soul should appreciate this touching adaptation of a classic book. It expands on the story and even departs considerably from the Roald Dahl feel and rhythm, but that wasn't a distraction or a negative feeling. It just felt like its own story, or maybe the real story upon which Dahl's short tale was based.

I give it five out of five cussin' stars.

My Review of Surrogates

Saturday, September 26th, 2009

surrogates-movie-posterSurrogates is a movie that takes place in a not-too-distant future where all interaction between humans is done through surrogate robots. From the safety of your home, you control a body that sees, hears, smells, tastes, and feels for you, allowing you to do all of the things you wanted to do in life without the fear of being injured or killed. You can have a surrogate that is a different sex, race, age, or even something that's brand new and unique. It's painted as an utopian future.

And, of course, in any utopian future, there is the faction of people who are unhappy with it. In this instance, the people who refuse to use machines to interact with other humans but who relish the human experience. And then there's the murder of a surrogate's user through the destruction of a surrogate, something that's supposed to be impossible. And Bruce Willis plays the FBI agent who investigates it all.

The movie had some really interesting concepts and in the hands of a better writer, or even as a movie longer than 88 minutes (or maybe a television series), it could have touched on some of the more fascinating aspects of this society. Have restaurants and hair salons gone out of business? Have surrogates gone to different planets and under the ocean? Could you make surrogates that are giant sized or microscopic? How do people keep from having their muscles atrophy?

Unfortunately, this movie just skimmed along and barely broke the surface of the ocean of possibilities. It was rather predictable, especially if you saw the previews that ruined the entire ending, and while everyone did a decent job acting, it was too heavy handed while being simultaneously shallow to really work well.

I'd give it a C.

My review of The Time Traveler's Wife (Spoiler Free)

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

Eric Bana notices a booger.

Eric Bana notices a booger.

Make no mistake about this film. It is a chick flick. It's a love story with science fiction elements. It's like if you took Steel Magnolias and made Julia Roberts's character a cyborg with laser beam eyes. Yeah, it's fucking cool, but don't expect her to go all flash fry killer robot on anyone.

Even though it was pointed directly at the female audience, I really enjoyed the movie. Eric Bana's Henry and Rachel McAdams's Clare have genuine feeling chemistry when the moment is right and have that sense of awkwardness when the moment isn't. As far as a love story and romantic movie go, it's clever and unique. It never felt really cliched or obvious (like in The Ugly Truth), and even the tearjerker moments weren't telegraphed a half hour ahead of time (like in The Ugly Truth). And Eric Bana could teach The Ugly Truth's Gerard Butler some lessons on speaking with an American accent.

This movie is sad. It's dark. It may make you cry. And if that's the type of movie that you're in the mood to see, go see this. If you want a fun romcom romp through time, rent Back to the Future.

Oh, and if I have to see another preview for that fucking idiot Tyler Perry's "I Can Do Bad All By Myself", I may stab my eyes out. It's unbelievable to see yet another black producer/writer/director make money by preying on stereotypes and cliched writing rather than trying to write stories about people.

Movie Reviews (Spoiler Free): GI Joe and Julie & Julia

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

Friday, I saw two movies. In the morning, I took all of my employees out to the theater like I do almost every Friday. We saw "G.I. Joe – The Rise of Cobra". In the evening, Amy and I ventured downtown to a new theater called the Plaza Cinema Cafe where we sat at one of the indoor bars, ordered food and drinks, and then watched "Julie and Julia". It's 10 PM on Friday night as I write this, and I'm fucking movied out.

Review #1: G.I. Joe – The Rise of Cobra

Did you ever play with action figures and make them smash into each other while saying "PEW PEW PEW KRRSHHBOOM" and come up with ludicrous scenarios that involved your couch being an arctic base and under the couch being the ocean and there were subs and planes and shooting and explosions and faulty logic but it was oh so much fun because you were in the moment? That's what this movie is. And let me tell you, I fucking hate director and writer Stephen Sommers. Almost every movie he's directed (Van Helsing, The Mummy, & The Mummy Returns) has been a huge stinking pile of shit. He's taken concepts that could have been so amazing and managed to turdify them until they're unrecognizable fecal failures. For some reason, though, it finally works here. Maybe the writers are better, although there's plenty of horrible dialogue, unnecessary exposition, and throwaway lines. Maybe he's matured as a director, although his use of the flashback fade is about as amateurish as Mic Night at the local coffee house. I think he just found a property that even he couldn't fuck up. It was cheesy and it was stupid as all hell, but it was fun, and I enjoyed watching it.

Review #2: Julie & Julia

Have I ever mentioned that I hate Meryl Streep? She's hideous to me, and I want her to die in a horrible car wreck that also claims the lives of Kyra Sedgwick and Glenn Close. Well, she's in this movie, but she manages to assume the role of Julia Child so well that I was able to keep my gorge from rising too much. The movie is based on a biography of Julia Child and a book by Julie Powell, which was in turn based on her blog. I've never heard of the book or her blog, and from what I saw in the movie, I wouldn't have had any interest in it, either. The movie was mildly entertaining, but dragged a bit too long and didn't really seem to have much of a point. I can see why people will enjoy it, but it's not exactly to my taste. See what I did there? It's a movie about cooking and I said taste! Ha!

Next Movie Friday is "District 9" and I'm not quite sure what to expect. On the negative side, it's produced by Peter Jackson, and he is an abominable hack with some of the worst taste I've ever seen (not to mention none of his movies have been any good since Frighteners). Also on the negative side, the director and writer, Neill Blomkamp, has absolutely no real credits to his name, so this is his first real endeavor. On the positive side, the previews do look cool. And everyone knows the previews never lie.

Things I hate about your blog

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

The definition of "your" that should be applied is one that applies to the blogosphere as a whole.

1. You have some type of video or music that plays automatically when I visit.
2. You haven't tested your blog in Firefox to make sure it's legible.
3. It's hard to comment because you're on Livejournal or AOL.
4. Your posts only show a few words and then I have to click to read the rest, every single time.
5. I can't subscribe to comments or your comment feed.
6. You have too many options when I'm trying to leave a comment.
7. You don't have comments open.
8. Every post is an apology about why you don't post enough, and then you don't post again for two weeks.
9. You use so many cutesy names for everyone that I have no fucking clue who's who.
10. You don't link to people when you use something of theirs.
11. Your ads obstruct your blog.
12. Your post is all one big jumbled mess in the feed reader.
13. You moderate comments.
14. You censor or edit comments.
15. You change blogs every three months.
16. Every other post is a Pay Per Post.
17. You don't try to use any type of spell check.
18. Most of your posts are private and password protected.
19. The colors make my eyes bleed.
20. Your posts are longer than most novels.

What do you hate about people's blogs?